tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10995029.post7947656121252859500..comments2009-01-03T10:45:03.867-05:00Comments on Discovering .NET: Linq to SQL performanceMaxim Alexeyevhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09080974570415524781noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10995029.post-84210237897983486282009-01-03T10:45:00.000-05:002009-01-03T10:45:00.000-05:00CSLA does not cover data access itself. We use ADO...CSLA does not cover data access itself. We use ADO.NET to retrieve and update data (SqlDataReader, SqlCommand), the latest sample that comes with CSLA written with Linq to SQL.<BR/><BR/>I was in our local .NET conference and saw demo on Alexandria. That's where they are going really.Maxim Alexeyevhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09080974570415524781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10995029.post-41430993820644871562009-01-02T20:33:00.000-05:002009-01-02T20:33:00.000-05:00Also, MS says Linq to SQL is going to be phased ou...Also, MS says Linq to SQL is going to be phased out by ADO.net entity framework. Probably yet more slower ;) How's CSLA perf comparing to pure ADO.Net?saldoukhovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12375943605531670856noreply@blogger.com